Various comments:

"With that speech Charles just destroyed the monarchy and England. The monarchy must profess the Protestant Christian faith. If it does anything else it is illegitimate and the constitutional settlement is broken. Charlie should do the right thing and go away rather than to pretend to fulfill a role that he had no intention of doing".

"The World of Man is a very dark & menacing place.

I put my trust in the Lord.

Joshua 1:9

9. Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go".

"For the head of the Church of England to choose a location that is now basically in ex-comunicado from it's religious roots and purpose ... I've spent time clarifying for myself exactly what the definition of a chapel 'used to mean' at least within the UK ... a place for Christian worship which can be a building connected to a hospital, university etc or a room within such buildings, often containing those specific things one finds in a church such as an alter etc.

I then looked for the background and history of the "Fitzrovia Chapel" and its specific design and contents ... a chancel ... a semi-circular baptistery (Its four windows depict soldier saints: Joan of Arc, Saint George, Saint Alban and Saint Martin) ... a font (four evangelists are depicted on the corners of the font, and its inscription is a Greek palindrome roughly translating as ‘wash clean my sins, not just my face’) ... and an altar ... all of which speak to me of a place of Christian worship ...

But today it is a Grade II listed building, in a private company's ownership, it no longer holds religious services and instead is simply a venue for hire for exhibitions, fashion shows, photo shoots, parties and anything else that brings in profit.

So the King, being the Head of the Church of England, specifically chose a non-religious location, which presents the background and impression within the speech that it is but which it no longer represents in any way whatsoever, to give a speech significant for the day it is given on as in to remember the birth of Jesus Christ.

Surely you only need this one RED flag to realise everything else coming out of his mouth would be on a very steep and slippery incline downwards?

There 'had to be' a reason why the Queen held him at arms length from the Crown until her last day on this Earth. Otherwise, if he had been cut from a true King's cloth, she would have relinquished the Crown to him many years ago ... but she didn't!

The fear underlying transhumanist ambitions -—the desire for technologically enhanced humans -—is deeply rooted in the fear of vulnerability and uncertainty that defines the human condition.  This fear, at its core, is a fear of being human.

Grok

This statement suggests that the drive behind transhumanism, which is the philosophy or movement advocating for the use of technology to enhance human capabilities beyond current biological limits, stems from a fundamental human fear. Specifically:

- Fear of Vulnerability: Humans are inherently vulnerable—physically, emotionally, and intellectually. Transhumanism seeks to overcome these vulnerabilities through technological enhancements, potentially leading to greater control over one's health, longevity, or even cognitive abilities.

- Fear of Uncertainty: Life is unpredictable, and humans often seek to mitigate this unpredictability. Transhumanism could be seen as an attempt to gain mastery over the uncertainties of life, aging, disease, and death by altering human biology or merging it with technology.

- Fear of Being Human: At a deeper level, this fear might be interpreted as a discomfort with the limitations and imperfections inherent in being human. The pursuit of transcending these through technology implies a rejection or at least an unease with human mortality, frailty, and the natural process of aging and death.

In essence, the statement critiques transhumanism by suggesting that its ambitions might be less about noble goals of human progress and more about escaping the very human conditions that define our existence. It poses a philosophical question about whether we should seek to change what it means to be human out of fear of our inherent nature.

https://t.me/toresaysPlus/66982?comment=5349666

By G K Chesterton

Step softly, under snow or rain,
To find the place where men can pray;
The way is all so very plain
That we may lose the way.

Oh, we have learnt to peer and pore
On tortured puzzles from our youth,
We know all labyrinthine lore,
We are the three wise men of yore,
And we know all things but the truth.

We have gone round and round the hill
And lost the wood among the trees,
And learnt long names for every ill,
And served the mad gods, naming still
The furies the Eumenides.

The gods of violence took the veil
Of vision and philosophy,
The Serpent that brought all men bale,
He bites his own accursed tail,
And calls himself Eternity.

Go humbly - it has hailed and snowed …
With voices low and lanterns lit;
So very simple is the road,
That we may stray from it.

The world grows terrible and white,
And blinding white the breaking day;
We walk bewildered in the light,
For something is too large for sight,
And something much too plain to say.

The Child that was ere worlds begun
(… We need but walk a little way,
We need but see a latch undone …)
The Child that played with moon and sun
Is playing with a little hay.

The house from which the heavens are fed,
The old strange house that is our own,
Where trick of words are never said,
And Mercy is as plain as bread,
And Honour is as hard as stone.

Go humbly, humble are the skies,
And low and large and fierce the Star;
So very near the Manger lies
That we may travel far.

Hark! Laughter like a lion wakes
To roar to the resounding plain.
And the whole heaven shouts and shakes,
For God Himself is born again,
And we are little children walking
Through the snow and rain.

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs explains how Syria was just one of 7 countries Benjamin Netanyahu wanted to destroy, and how he has succeeded in getting the US to overthrow the governments of 6 out of the 7.…

Only one remains now,…Iran.

https://x.com/afshinrattansi/status/1866429396892237945?t=oBubtYHLkna269280t0X_Q&s=19

By Tod Hayen:

I used to believe that the only way we were going to get out of this mess was to flip sheep (apologies to those offended by my continued use of the word “sheep” -—old habits die hard). Meaning that if we got everyone, or mostly everyone, to see what truly was going on, then we could stop the insanity.

In other words, if everyone woke up there would be no more compliance, no more believing in the lies, no more falling into the agenda’s traps.

Now I am not so sure.

It seems now that the only way this insanity will work its way out is either by a direct act of God or if we are willing to wait 1,000 years or so when it works out on its own. Maybe we just need to face Armageddon, let it happen, and try to live the best life we can before and while it’s happening. I don’t mean “give up,” I mean to still fight but focus the fight on things other than trying to flip sheep.

I know I’ve said this before, but now I am refining this idea a bit. Although I do believe once we know something, we can’t unknow it—meaning we can’t force ourselves into a state of denial and pretend all is rosy as the sheep tend to do (now that they’ve got Trump to feel dismal about, maybe they won’t be all rosy, but for the wrong reasons). But maybe we should stop focusing on it so much and try to get back to the basics of joyous living. Did I really just say that? No, of course not.

I have found myself envying the sheep. I recently had a friend on FB question something I had posted (a comment actually on someone’s meme about chemtrails). She had said she simply did not understand what was being said negatively about natural contrails that jets innocently leave behind. I turned her on to a James Corbett video interviewing Peter Kirby about chemtrails.

She responded with the usual disbelief--“how could people be doing this without anyone knowing—purposefully poisoning the earth and all of the people on it?”

I didn’t push it and just said, “You seem to be enjoying your life, keep doing that and don’t let this cat out of the bag. Let it go.”

It was the first time I did something like that, and it felt right. I had the opportunity to possibly flip a sheep, and I didn’t take it. I believe, however, that this “letting go” only applies to sheep. Whereas before, I wanted sheep to learn the truth about the world, now I am not so anxious to be the one to wreck their day.

They will figure it out soon enough.

Read more here . . .