This is from the web site of freelance journalist Jim Stone, and I'm not sure what to make of it. It could be significant; I have wondered why the test has to be so invasive. More research needed - maybe time will tell.
"THEY ARE BUSTED, AVOID THE TEST AT ALL COSTS, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL IT IS BUT IT IS CLEARLY NOT AS ADVERTISED.
The Coronavirus test is not credible and likely to be for clandestine brain access.
They are claiming the virus wrecks the nervous systems of a large percentage of people, leaving lasting neurological problems and brain damage. But I'd like to ask - is it really a virus doing that, or are the tests doing that?
Folks, the coronavirus tests themselves, in many cases, (there are probably different types) but in many cases they are obviously what is causing the brain damage. Easily explained:
Many of the tests, (all of them that use the incredibly long "swab") take their samples from the cribriform plate, which is a millimeter thick bone at the top of the nasal cavity that is perforated with many holes that go directly into the brain cavity. These holes are what your olfactory nerves pass through, and there are many (the bone is similar to a coarse screen)
If you wanted to sabotage someone by planting a clandestine brain virus, nano tech, or plant a chip in someone, this would be the place to do it because perhaps a doctor could get a chip out but individuals certainly never could without perforating that very thin bone (that is not really even bone, it is about half nerves) and anyone attempting to do an extraction from there would likely end up killing themselves".
Any chemicals, viruses, nanotech or whatever else they wanted to put there will have immediate access to the brain and you can forget about getting that out, once it's in, it is in. It would be literally right on the brain when placed, and go right in.
People complain about the tests being excruciatingly painful with the pain lasting for days. For what reason would the tests need to touch the most brain accessible part of the human body? Are the ones that do really tests at all? DNA tests are done with a simple mouth swab, and it's ridiculous to think any virus test - when you supposedly can spread it by coughing, - would not be the same. Something is screwy with these tests. They have GOT TO be fake, (or at least the ones that literally swab the brain are) No wonder why they hurt for days and GEE, getting your olfactory nerves nailed by whatever is on that swab is probably what is causing people to permanently lose their sense of smell.
COMMON SENSE. I bet you did not know how nasty that test really is. Avoid the test at all costs.
My first post ever on this topic mocked the entire concept of a coronavirus being massively lethal. The obviously unnecessarily invasive "tests" strongly indicate this is TOTALLY fake and they are not tests at all. That's why we end up getting Kiwi fruit testing positive and people who signed up and left before testing getting calls saying they were positive.
THERE IS NO CORONAVIRUS TEST IF KIWI AND NO-TESTS THAT PUT THEIR INFO ON A LIST GET CALLED, THAT IS HAPPENING. They are doing something entirely other than testing and the close proximity to the brain really opens up a reason for questioning what those tests really are".
The random thoughts of 99th Monkey . . . an occasional rant and other reflections in the hall of mirrors.