The clearest explanation of why the PCR test being used in the testing program in the UK and elsewhere is not suitable for diagnosis, in the words of its inventor, the 1993 Nobel Prize winner in chemistry, Kary Mullis.
Exposing the 'positive tests for new infections' scam. Prof. @carlheneghan and Prof. Emeritus of Immunology, Beda M. Stadler, telling you the truth that Matt Hancock and the mainstream media are distorting - see video below:
Bottom line: Government policy is largely being driven by the results of a completely unsuitable and inaccurate test which produces massive numbers of false positives; these figures are then used to make the claim that there are growing numbers of "cases" and/or "infections", and this in turn is used to ramp up fear in the public (in order to make them easier to manipulate) and to justify increasingly draconian curtailing of civil liberties, more repressive lockdowns, leading to the further destruction of the economy, especially small businesses, and ever increasing mental and physical health problems for growing numbers of adults and children. The policy of expanding the testing program (to which 2/3 of the yearly budget of the NHS has been allocated) will clearly create a positive feedback loop resulting in more and more of all the above. Are you ready for that?!
And just to be clear, it has long been established that there are two criteria for defining a sick person with an infectious disease:
1 The person exhibits a clear pattern of symptoms matching those of the disease;
2 The infectious organism (pathogen) responsible for the disease is found to be present in that person
Neither of these criteria are met in a person defined by the test as a "case" or an "infection". Most people testing positive have absolutely no symptoms, and an infectious agent is absent. In fact the "SARS -COV2 virus" has NEVER actually been identified or isolated in any alleged COVID patients.
The random thoughts of 99th Monkey . . . an occasional rant and other reflections in the hall of mirrors.