What Next? Some thoughts from Twitter

@NeilClark66
"That’s why non-compliance with mandatory masks was so essential. It wasn’t about public health (they told us not to wear them in March!) but about behavioural psychologists testing our compliance for other measures they had planned. Sadly too many obeyed so restrictions increase".

@efg35663548
"Well put Neil. Mandatory masks was a experimental compliance tool to see how easy the public would obey. Then further restrictions would be imposed that is why it was essential to not comply".

@7dadams
"Agreed the mandatory muzzle was the tip of the iceberg for me. To mandate a law forcing people to cover half their face with a bit of cloth needs strong evidence to do so. There wasn't any and now after compliance from the masses it strengthens the govt hand such as the rule of 6".

@zukibites
"After the 6 person rule it’ll be the 10pm curfew, then full lockdown in October. Intended to wear us down, condition us to be obedient. All leading towards a coerced vaccination & ‘COVI PASS’ digital ID".

@BorisTraitor
The fact that they referred to it as a possibility suggests to me, and you, that the curfew will go ahead, together with 'freedom passes' as @BorisJohnson put it.